You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
School-age Outcomes of Very Preterm Infants After Antenatal Treatment With Magnesium Sulfate vs Placebo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2014.11189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lex W. Doyle, Peter J. Anderson, Ross Haslam, Katherine J. Lee, Caroline Crowther |
| Abstract |
Antenatal magnesium sulfate given to pregnant women at imminent risk of very preterm delivery reduces the risk of cerebral palsy in early childhood, although its effects into school age have not been reported from randomized trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 23% |
| Unknown | 50 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 37% |
| Psychology | 28 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 57 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#928,108
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#8,053
of 36,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,578
of 259,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#129
of 372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.