↓ Skip to main content

情報科学の開拓者としてのDr. Garfieldの足跡 その主要業績,社会貢献,経営者として

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
情報科学の開拓者としてのDr. Garfieldの足跡 その主要業績,社会貢献,経営者として
Published in
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, October 2017
DOI 10.18919/jkg.67.10_546
Authors

David A. PENDLEBURY

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#16,588,625
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#307
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,156
of 331,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.