You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid identification of primary constituents in parotoid gland secretions of the Australian cane toad using HPLC/MS‐Q‐TOF
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Chromatography, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/bmc.2858 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Jing, Wei C. Ren, Chun Li, Utpal Bose, Harendra S. Parekh, Ming Q. Wei |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,484,586
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Chromatography
#187
of 2,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,654
of 292,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Chromatography
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.