↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based National Recovery Plan for Leptidea sinapis (wood white butterfly) in Southern Britain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Conservation, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Evidence-based National Recovery Plan for Leptidea sinapis (wood white butterfly) in Southern Britain
Published in
Journal of Insect Conservation, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10841-010-9374-3
Authors

Stephen Jeffcoate, Jenny Joy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 10%
Belgium 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 48%
Environmental Science 6 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,540,398
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#268
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,758
of 182,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.