| Title |
Decaffeinated green and black tea polyphenols decrease weight gain and alter microbiome populations and function in diet-induced obese mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-017-1542-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanne M. Henning, Jieping Yang, Mark Hsu, Ru-Po Lee, Emma M. Grojean, Austin Ly, Chi-Hong Tseng, David Heber, Zhaoping Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| France | 5 | 7% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Botswana | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
| Scientists | 7 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 160 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 67 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 942. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#18,043
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#12
of 2,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285
of 333,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.