↓ Skip to main content

Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Pediatrics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
359 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management
Published in
JAMA Pediatrics, December 2017
DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linyan Meng, Mohan Pammi, Anirudh Saronwala, Pilar Magoulas, Andrew Ray Ghazi, Francesco Vetrini, Jing Zhang, Weimin He, Avinash V. Dharmadhikari, Chunjing Qu, Patricia Ward, Alicia Braxton, Swetha Narayanan, Xiaoyan Ge, Mari J. Tokita, Teresa Santiago-Sim, Hongzheng Dai, Theodore Chiang, Hadley Smith, Mahshid S. Azamian, Laurie Robak, Bret L. Bostwick, Christian P. Schaaf, Lorraine Potocki, Fernando Scaglia, Carlos A. Bacino, Neil A. Hanchard, Michael F. Wangler, Daryl Scott, Chester Brown, Jianhong Hu, John W. Belmont, Lindsay C. Burrage, Brett H. Graham, Vernon Reid Sutton, William J. Craigen, Sharon E. Plon, James R. Lupski, Arthur L. Beaudet, Richard A. Gibbs, Donna M. Muzny, Marcus J. Miller, Xia Wang, Magalie S. Leduc, Rui Xiao, Pengfei Liu, Chad Shaw, Magdalena Walkiewicz, Weimin Bi, Fan Xia, Brendan Lee, Christine M. Eng, Yaping Yang, Seema R. Lalani

Abstract

While congenital malformations and genetic diseases are a leading cause of early infant death, to our knowledge, the contribution of single-gene disorders in this group is undetermined. To determine the diagnostic yield and use of clinical exome sequencing in critically ill infants. Clinical exome sequencing was performed for 278 unrelated infants within the first 100 days of life who were admitted to Texas Children's Hospital in Houston, Texas, during a 5-year period between December 2011 and January 2017. Exome sequencing types included proband exome, trio exome, and critical trio exome, a rapid genomic assay for seriously ill infants. Indications for testing, diagnostic yield of clinical exome sequencing, turnaround time, molecular findings, patient age at diagnosis, and effect on medical management among a group of critically ill infants who were suspected to have genetic disorders. The mean (SEM) age for infants participating in the study was 28.5 (1.7) days; of these, the mean (SEM) age was 29.0 (2.2) days for infants undergoing proband exome sequencing, 31.5 (3.9) days for trio exome, and 22.7 (3.9) days for critical trio exome. Clinical indications for exome sequencing included a range of medical concerns. Overall, a molecular diagnosis was achieved in 102 infants (36.7%) by clinical exome sequencing, with relatively low yield for cardiovascular abnormalities. The diagnosis affected medical management for 53 infants (52.0%) and had a substantial effect on informed redirection of care, initiation of new subspecialist care, medication/dietary modifications, and furthering life-saving procedures in select patients. Critical trio exome sequencing revealed a molecular diagnosis in 32 of 63 infants (50.8%) at a mean (SEM) of 33.1 (5.6) days of life with a mean (SEM) turnaround time of 13.0 (0.4) days. Clinical care was altered by the diagnosis in 23 of 32 patients (71.9%). The diagnostic yield, patient age at diagnosis, and medical effect in the group that underwent critical trio exome sequencing were significantly different compared with the group who underwent regular exome testing. For deceased infants (n = 81), genetic disorders were molecularly diagnosed in 39 (48.1%) by exome sequencing, with implications for recurrence risk counseling. Exome sequencing is a powerful tool for the diagnostic evaluation of critically ill infants with suspected monogenic disorders in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units and its use has a notable effect on clinical decision making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 207 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 268 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Master 36 13%
Other 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 76 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 90 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 357. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#90,377
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Pediatrics
#321
of 6,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,047
of 446,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Pediatrics
#6
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.