| Title |
The use of continuous glucose monitoring systems in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes mellitus in real-life settings: the AWeSoMe Study Group experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Diabetologica, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00592-014-0643-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Rachmiel, Z. Landau, M. Boaz, K. Mazor Aronovitch, N. Loewenthal, M. Ben-Ami, Y. Levy-Shraga, D. Modan-Moses, A. Haim, S. Abiri, O. Pinhas-Hamiel |
| Abstract |
The aim of the study was (a) to compare annual glycemic control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who used a healthcare-funded continuous glucose monitoring system (RT-CGMS) to that of those who performed self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) only, in a real-life setting, and (b) to define parameters associated with compliance and glycemic control. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,730,854
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#159
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,029
of 226,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.