↓ Skip to main content

Aridification of the Sahara desert caused by Tethys Sea shrinkage during the Late Miocene

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
35 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aridification of the Sahara desert caused by Tethys Sea shrinkage during the Late Miocene
Published in
Nature, September 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhongshi Zhang, Gilles Ramstein, Mathieu Schuster, Camille Li, Camille Contoux, Qing Yan

Abstract

It is widely believed that the Sahara desert is no more than ∼2-3 million years (Myr) old, with geological evidence showing a remarkable aridification of north Africa at the onset of the Quaternary ice ages. Before that time, north African aridity was mainly controlled by the African summer monsoon (ASM), which oscillated with Earth's orbital precession cycles. Afterwards, the Northern Hemisphere glaciation added an ice volume forcing on the ASM, which additionally oscillated with glacial-interglacial cycles. These findings led to the idea that the Sahara desert came into existence when the Northern Hemisphere glaciated ∼2-3 Myr ago. The later discovery, however, of aeolian dune deposits ∼7 Myr old suggested a much older age, although this interpretation is hotly challenged and there is no clear mechanism for aridification around this time. Here we use climate model simulations to identify the Tortonian stage (∼7-11 Myr ago) of the Late Miocene epoch as the pivotal period for triggering north African aridity and creating the Sahara desert. Through a set of experiments with the Norwegian Earth System Model and the Community Atmosphere Model, we demonstrate that the African summer monsoon was drastically weakened by the Tethys Sea shrinkage during the Tortonian, allowing arid, desert conditions to expand across north Africa. Not only did the Tethys shrinkage alter the mean climate of the region, it also enhanced the sensitivity of the African monsoon to orbital forcing, which subsequently became the major driver of Sahara extent fluctuations. These important climatic changes probably caused the shifts in Asian and African flora and fauna observed during the same period, with possible links to the emergence of early hominins in north Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 253 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 24%
Researcher 50 19%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 43 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 100 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 20%
Environmental Science 19 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 56 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#312,755
of 25,393,455 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#16,767
of 97,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,867
of 261,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#255
of 994 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 994 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.