↓ Skip to main content

A pyrene based fluorescent turn-on chemosensor: aggregation-induced emission enhancement and application towards Fe3+ and Fe2+ recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pyrene based fluorescent turn-on chemosensor: aggregation-induced emission enhancement and application towards Fe3+ and Fe2+ recognition
Published in
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, October 2020
DOI 10.1039/c7pp00329c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sachin D. Padghan, Avinash L. Puyad, Rajesh S. Bhosale, Sidhanath V. Bhosale, Sheshanath V. Bhosale

Abstract

A pyrene-based probe bearing benzothiazole ionophore (Py-BTZ) was synthesised as a "turn-on" fluorescent chemosensor for the detection of Fe(3+) and Fe(2+) ions in CH3CN : H2O (1 : 1, v/v) solvent mixes. The chemosensor showed optical as well as colorimetric changes towards Fe(3+) and Fe(2+) ions along with a remarkable enhancement in fluorescence emission. The detection limit of Py-BTZ towards Fe(3+) and Fe(2+) ions was found to be 2.61 μM and 2.06 μM, respectively. The binding of Py-BTZ with Fe(3+) and Fe(2+) was determined by using FT-IR experiments. Interestingly, Py-BTZ shows aggregation induced emission enhancement (AIEE) properties in polar solvent mixes such as CH3CN : H2O (1 : 1, v/v).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Materials Science 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#13,056,263
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences
#648
of 1,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,291
of 419,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences
#174
of 808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,561 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.