↓ Skip to main content

A Journey into the Technical Evolution of Neuroendoscopy

Overview of attention for article published in World Neurosurgery, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Journey into the Technical Evolution of Neuroendoscopy
Published in
World Neurosurgery, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Di Ieva, Mallorie Tam, Manfred Tschabitscher, Michael D. Cusimano

Abstract

Neuroendoscopy has become a well-accepted technique in neurosurgery. After the introduction of the endoscope in medical practice by Phillip Bozzini in 1806, influential individuals such as Harold Hopkins and Karl Storz paved the way for its current success. With the present pace of technologic advancements, great improvement in the instrumentation is expected along with the status of neuroendoscopy in the neurosurgical field. Specific attention is given to the history of the development of the endoscope, while also discussing more recent advances dating from 1990 onward. The importance of each development for the purpose of the instrument is explained. Gaps in the literature regarding the technical aspects of neuroendoscopy, including the optical physics in the endoscope, three-dimensional endoscopy, and clinical applications of neuroendoscopy and robotics, are addressed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 34%
Engineering 9 14%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 30%