You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental‐scale conservation planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1890/07-1684.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carissa Klein, Kerrie Wilson, Matthew Watts, Janet Stein, Sandra Berry, Josie Carwardine, Mark Stafford Smith, Brendan Mackey, Hugh Possingham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 3% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 344 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 118 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 157 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 157 | 39% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 43 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2011.
All research outputs
#3,552,977
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#892
of 3,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,444
of 183,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.