↓ Skip to main content

Incorporating evolutionary processes into conservation planning using species distribution data: a case study with the western Mediterranean herpetofauna

Overview of attention for article published in Diversity & Distributions, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incorporating evolutionary processes into conservation planning using species distribution data: a case study with the western Mediterranean herpetofauna
Published in
Diversity & Distributions, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00752.x
Authors

Sílvia B. Carvalho, José C. Brito, Eduardo J. Crespo, Hugh P. Possingham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 10 4%
Portugal 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 210 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 22%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 14 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 59%
Environmental Science 56 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Unspecified 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 23 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2011.
All research outputs
#5,156,038
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#788
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,561
of 119,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.