↓ Skip to main content

Curiously the same: swapping tools between linguistics and evolutionary biology

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Curiously the same: swapping tools between linguistics and evolutionary biology
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10539-017-9594-y
Authors

Lindell Bromham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 33%
Linguistics 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,053,644
of 24,648,202 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#619
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,644
of 322,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,648,202 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.