| Title |
Evaluation of position dependency in non-apneic snorers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00405-013-2570-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. B. L. Benoist, S. Morong, J. P. van Maanen, A. A. J. Hilgevoord, N. de Vries |
| Abstract |
The aims of this study are to determine the prevalence of position dependency in non-apneic snorers, as defined by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) guidelines, and to investigate the influence of various factors such as BMI, neck circumference, age, gender, and sleep efficiency on sleeping position. A cohort of consecutive patients was screened for complaints of excessive snoring or symptoms suspicious for sleep disordered breathing. Overnight polysomnographic data were collected and non-apneic snorers who met all the inclusion criteria were selected for statistical analysis. To assess position-dependent snoring, the snore index (total snores/h) was used. Supine-dependent patients were defined as having a supine snore index higher than their total non-supine snore index. 76 patients were eligible for statistical analysis. Prevalence of position dependency in non-apneic snorers was 65.8% (p < 0.008). A stepwise regression showed that only BMI had a significant effect (p < 0.003) on the supine snore index. This is the first study that uses the AASM guidelines to accurately define non-apneic snorers (AHI < 5) and provides scientific evidence that the majority of non-apneic snorers are supine dependent. Furthermore, these results show that non-apneic snorers with a higher BMI snore more frequently in supine position. The use of sleep position therapy therefore, has the potential to play a significant role in improving snoring and its associated physical and psychosocial health outcomes in this population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,237,640
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#2,017
of 3,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,786
of 194,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#35
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,058 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.