↓ Skip to main content

Malignant ascites: pathophysiology and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Malignant ascites: pathophysiology and treatment
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10147-012-0396-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emanuel Cavazzoni, Walter Bugiantella, Luigina Graziosi, Maria Silvia Franceschini, Annibale Donini

Abstract

Malignant ascites (MA) accompanies a variety of abdominal and extra-abdominal tumors. It is a primary cause of morbidity and raises several treatment challenges. MA has several symptoms, producing a significant reduction in the patient's quality of life: loss of proteins and electrolyte disorders cause diffuse oedema, while the accumulation of abdominal fluid facilitates sepsis. Treatment options include a multitude of different procedures with limited efficacy and some degree of risk. A Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library review of medical, interventional and surgical treatments of MA has been performed. Medical therapy, primarily paracentesis and diuretics, are first-line treatments in managing MA. Paracentesis is widely adopted but it is associated with significant patient discomfort and several risks. Diuretic therapy is effective at the very beginning of the disease but efficacy declines with tumor progression. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and radioisotopes are promising medical options but their clinical application is not yet completely elucidated, and further investigations and trials are necessary. Peritoneal-venous shunts are rarely used due to high rates of early mortality and complications. Laparoscopy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been proposed as palliative therapy. Literature on the use of laparoscopic HIPEC in MA includes only reports with small numbers of patients, all showing successful control of ascites. To date, none of the different options has been subjected to evidence-based clinical trials and there are no accepted guidelines for the management of MA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 19%
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Other 17 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,942,073
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#129
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,474
of 161,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.