↓ Skip to main content

Influence of similarity measures on the performance of the analog method for downscaling daily precipitation

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Influence of similarity measures on the performance of the analog method for downscaling daily precipitation
Published in
Climate Dynamics, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00382-007-0277-2
Authors

C. Matulla, X. Zhang, X. L. Wang, J. Wang, E. Zorita, S. Wagner, H. von Storch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Master 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 40%
Environmental Science 11 19%
Engineering 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,540,801
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,033
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,657
of 68,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.