↓ Skip to main content

Absence of Learning and Local Specialization on Host Plant Selection by Heliconius erato

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Behavior, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Absence of Learning and Local Specialization on Host Plant Selection by Heliconius erato
Published in
Journal of Insect Behavior, May 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10905-005-3701-7
Authors

Solange M. Kerpel, Gilson R. P. Moreira

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 6%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 81 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 69%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Behavior
#160
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,294
of 72,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Behavior
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them