↓ Skip to main content

cnvCapSeq: detecting copy number variation in long-range targeted resequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
cnvCapSeq: detecting copy number variation in long-range targeted resequencing data
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1093/nar/gku849
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evangelos Bellos, Vikrant Kumar, Clarabelle Lin, Jordi Maggi, Zai Yang Phua, Ching-Yu Cheng, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Martin L. Hibberd, Tien Yin Wong, Lachlan J. M. Coin, Sonia Davila

Abstract

Targeted resequencing technologies have allowed for efficient and cost-effective detection of genomic variants in specific regions of interest. Although capture sequencing has been primarily used for investigating single nucleotide variants and indels, it has the potential to elucidate a broader spectrum of genetic variation, including copy number variants (CNVs). Various methods exist for detecting CNV in whole-genome and exome sequencing datasets. However, no algorithms have been specifically designed for contiguous target sequencing, despite its increasing importance in clinical and research applications. We have developed cnvCapSeq, a novel method for accurate and sensitive CNV discovery and genotyping in long-range targeted resequencing. cnvCapSeq was benchmarked using a simulated contiguous capture sequencing dataset comprising 21 genomic loci of various lengths. cnvCapSeq was shown to outperform the best existing exome CNV method by a wide margin both in terms of sensitivity (92.0 versus 48.3%) and specificity (99.8 versus 70.5%). We also applied cnvCapSeq to a real capture sequencing cohort comprising a contiguous 358 kb region that contains the Complement Factor H gene cluster. In this dataset, cnvCapSeq identified 41 samples with CNV, including two with duplications, with a genotyping accuracy of 99%, as ascertained by quantitative real-time PCR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 58 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Computer Science 7 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#13,660
of 27,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,070
of 246,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#133
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.