| Title |
The distribution and density of a lycaenid butterfly in relation to Lasius ants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, September 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00317635 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Jordano, J. Rodríguez, C. D. Thomas, J. Fernández Haeger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Professor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,307,142
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#374
of 4,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#587
of 18,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.