| Title |
The Performance of Neighbor-Joining Methods of Phylogenetic Reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Algorithmica, June 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/pl00008277 |
| Authors |
K. Atteson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 35% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2011.
All research outputs
#6,440,922
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Algorithmica
#70
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,166
of 35,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithmica
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them