You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecological connectivity or Barrier Fence? Critical choices on the agricultural margins of Western Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Management & Restoration, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/emr.12130 |
| Authors |
Keith Bradby, James A. Fitzsimons, Andrew Del Marco, Don A. Driscoll, Euan G. Ritchie, Jenny Lau, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Richard J. Hobbs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 33 | 47% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 76% |
| Scientists | 12 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 22 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#738,873
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Management & Restoration
#17
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,426
of 260,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Management & Restoration
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them