↓ Skip to main content

Decoding cyanobacterial phylogeny and molecular evolution using an evonumeric approach

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Decoding cyanobacterial phylogeny and molecular evolution using an evonumeric approach
Published in
Protoplasma, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00709-014-0699-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prashant Singh, Satya Shila Singh, Marina Aboal, Arun Kumar Mishra

Abstract

Forty-one heterocystous cyanobacteria strains representing 12 cyanobacterial genera collected from all across India were assessed in phylogenetic and evolutionary perspectives. The structural gene 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the functional genes nifD and psbA were selected as molecular chronometers in this study. The phylogenetic analyses demonstrated the monophyly of heterocystous cyanobacteria with significant intermixing, along with establishing the polyphyly of Stigonematales, strongly supporting the need for re-amendments in cyanobacterial taxonomy and systematics. Molecular trends obtained did not clearly reflect the phenotypic affiliations, thus advocating for genetic characterizations using more molecular markers. Large-scale evonumeric extrapolations of gene sequence data of all the three molecular markers was performed to assess the evolutionary pace of heterocystous cyanobacteria on the basis of nucleotide diversity, recombination frequencies, and the DNA divergence between the sampled taxa. The obtained results tilted the evolutionary pace in favor of the less complex Nostocales thus indicating that possibly the simple non-branched forms are more flexible and adaptive for evolutionary diversifications as compared to the more complex and branched ones. This study hence represents a unique blend of molecular phylogeny with evogenomic sequence analyses for understanding the genetic diversity, phylogeny, and evolutionary pace within the heterocystous cyanobacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Peru 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 34%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 26%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,044,094
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#471
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,550
of 259,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.