↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

INTERMACS Analysis of Stroke During Support With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Risk Factors and Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
INTERMACS Analysis of Stroke During Support With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Risk Factors and Outcomes
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.06.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deepak Acharya, Renzo Loyaga-Rendon, Charity J. Morgan, Kara A. Sands, Salpy V. Pamboukian, Indranee Rajapreyar, William L. Holman, James K. Kirklin, José A. Tallaj

Abstract

This study sought to evaluate predictors of stroke during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support from data available prior to implantation, and quantify stroke-related morbidity and mortality. Stroke is a major complication after LVAD. Pre-implant factors that influence stroke are not well understood. We evaluated all patients in INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) who were implanted with continuous flow LVADs from May 1, 2012, to March 31, 2015. Pre-operative risk factors for stroke and stroke incidence, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. During the study period, 7,112 patients underwent continuous flow LVAD placement. Median follow-up was 9.79 months (range 0.02 to 34.96 months). Of all patients, 752 (10.57%) had at least 1 stroke, with an incidence rate of 0.123 strokes per patient-year. A total of 447 (51.38%) strokes were ischemic and 423 (48.62%) were hemorrhagic. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke had worse survival than those with ischemic strokes (30-day survival: 45.3% vs. 80.7%; p < 0.001). Of patients with a first stroke, 13% had a second stroke. Pre-implant predictors of stroke were female sex (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25 to 1.82; p < 0.001), pre-implant systolic blood pressure (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.01; p = 0.002), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HR: 3.68; 95% CI: 1.60 to 8.47; p = 0.002), intra-aortic balloon pump (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.46; p = 0.043), and primary cardiac diagnosis (ischemic/other/unknown) (p = 0.040). Despite improvements in LVAD technology, stroke-related morbidity and mortality is substantial. Further investigation is necessary to decrease the risk of this devastating complication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Other 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 37 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 35%
Engineering 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 45 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2018.
All research outputs
#572,780
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#149
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,183
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.