You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natural Gas versus Coal: Is Natural Gas Better for the Climate?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Electricity Journal, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tej.2014.07.007 |
| Authors |
Chris Busch, Eric Gimon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 27% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Brazil | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Nepal | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 96% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Energy | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 28% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#597,659
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Electricity Journal
#14
of 570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,435
of 241,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electricity Journal
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them