↓ Skip to main content

Metal Concentrations in Eurasian Eagle Owl Pellets as a Function of Reproductive Variables in Korea

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Metal Concentrations in Eurasian Eagle Owl Pellets as a Function of Reproductive Variables in Korea
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00244-017-0457-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dong-Man Shin, Jong-Min Oh, Jungsoo Kim

Abstract

Eight metals were analyzed in the pellet of Eurasian eagle owls (Bubo bubo) breeding in Korea: Paju, Ganghwa, Gimpo, and Sihwa, Gyeonggi-do (N = 15, respectively). Except for cadmium (Cd), concentrations of all metals differed among sites (ANOVA, p < 0.001); Sihwa had relatively higher metal concentrations compared with other sites. Clutch size did not differ among the four sites. However, Sihwa had the greatest nesting success and number of fledglings (per hatchlings and laid egg) and highest mean weight of diet. Lead concentrations in the pellets were generally lower than the excrements of various birds worldwide. We suggest that all metal concentrations in pellets do not negatively affect the reproduction of Eurasian eagle owls, and food supply at Sihwa seems likely more important to breeding success than metal contamination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,541,858
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1,565
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,607
of 324,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.