↓ Skip to main content

The current state of the neurogenic theory of depression and anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Neurobiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
526 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The current state of the neurogenic theory of depression and anxiety
Published in
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.conb.2014.08.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradley R Miller, René Hen

Abstract

Newborn neurons are continuously added to the adult hippocampus. Early studies found that adult neurogenesis is impaired in models of depression and anxiety and accelerated by antidepressant treatment. This led to the theory that depression results from impaired adult neurogenesis and restoration of adult neurogenesis leads to recovery. Follow up studies yielded a complex body of often inconsistent results, and the veracity of this theory is uncertain. We propose five criteria for acceptance of this theory, we review the recent evidence for each criterion, and we draw the following conclusions: Diverse animal models of depression and anxiety have impaired neurogenesis. Neurogenesis is consistently boosted by antidepressants in animal models only when animals are stressed. Ablation of neurogenesis in animal models impairs cognitive functions relevant to depression, but only a minority of studies find that ablation causes depression or anxiety. Recent human neuroimaging and postmortem studies are consistent with the neurogenic theory, but they are indirect. Finally, a novel drug developed based on the neurogenic theory is promising in animal models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 526 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 514 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 18%
Student > Bachelor 88 17%
Researcher 68 13%
Student > Master 64 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 7%
Other 80 15%
Unknown 92 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 130 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 12%
Psychology 48 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 5%
Other 58 11%
Unknown 114 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,050,859
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Neurobiology
#277
of 2,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,773
of 260,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Neurobiology
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.