↓ Skip to main content

Rice starch granule amylolysis – Differentiating effects of particle size, morphology, thermal properties and crystalline polymorph

Overview of attention for article published in Carbohydrate Polymers, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rice starch granule amylolysis – Differentiating effects of particle size, morphology, thermal properties and crystalline polymorph
Published in
Carbohydrate Polymers, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sushil Dhital, Vito M. Butardo, Stephen A. Jobling, Michael J. Gidley

Abstract

The underlying mechanism of amylolysis of rice starch granules was investigated using isolated starch granules from wild-type, as well as SBEIIb mutant and down-regulated lines. Fused granule agglomerates isolated from mutant and transgenic lines were hydrolysed at similar rates by amylases, and had similar crystalline patterns and thermal properties as individual granules. Surface pores, a feature previously only reported for A-polymorphic starch granules, were also observed in B- and C-polymorphic rice starch granules. Although the microscopic patterns of hydrolysis among granules with different crystalline polymorphs were qualitatively similar, the extent and the rate of amylolysis were different, suggesting that B-type crystalline polymorphs are intrinsically more resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis than A-type in rice starch granules. It is proposed that the slightly longer branch lengths of amylopectin which leads to the formation of more stable B-type double helical structures compared to their A-type counterparts is the major parameter, with other factors such as granule size, surface pores and interior channels having secondary roles, in determining the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of rice starch granules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 30%
Chemistry 12 12%
Engineering 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Chemical Engineering 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 35 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Carbohydrate Polymers
#3,932
of 5,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,729
of 248,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbohydrate Polymers
#56
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.