↓ Skip to main content

An Evolutionary Perspective of Sex-Typed Toy Preferences: Pink, Blue, and the Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
An Evolutionary Perspective of Sex-Typed Toy Preferences: Pink, Blue, and the Brain
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1021833110722
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerianne M. Alexander

Abstract

Large sex differences in children's toy preferences are attributed to gender group identification and social learning. The proposal outlined in this paper is that contemporary conceptual categories of "masculine" or "feminine" toys are also influenced by evolved perceptual categories of male-preferred and female-preferred objects. Research on children exposed prenatally to atypical levels of androgens and research on typically developing infants suggest sex-dimorphic preferences exist for object features, such as movement or color/form. The evolution and neurobiology of mammalian visual processing--and recent findings on sex-dimorphic toy preferences in nonhuman primates--suggest further that an innate bias for processing object movement or color/form may contribute to behaviors with differential adaptive significance for males and females. In this way, preferences for objects such as toys may indicate a biological preparedness for a "masculine" or "feminine" gender role-one that develops more fully as early perceptual preferences are coupled with object experiences imposed by contemporary gender socialization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Australia 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 186 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 25%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 44 22%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 43%
Social Sciences 21 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 31 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,420,450
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#723
of 3,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,421
of 140,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.