↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of interventions aimed at increasing physical activity in adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain—protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 2,048)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A systematic review of interventions aimed at increasing physical activity in adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain—protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Marley, Mark A Tully, Alison Porter-Armstrong, Brendan Bunting, John O’Hanlon, Suzanne M McDonough

Abstract

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is highly prevalent, affecting around one in five people across Europe. Osteoarthritis, low back pain, neck pain and other musculoskeletal disorders are leading causes of disability worldwide and the most common source of chronic pain. Exercise and/or physical activity interventions have the potential to address not only the pain and disability associated with chronic pain but also the increased risk of morbidity and mortality seen in this population. Although exercise and/or physical activity is widely recommended, there is currently a paucity of research that offers an evidence base upon which the development or optimisation of interventions can be based. This systematic review will investigate the components of interventions associated with changes in physical activity levels in adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 16%
Sports and Recreations 14 8%
Psychology 13 7%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 51 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2021.
All research outputs
#241,852
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#18
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,357
of 251,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.