↓ Skip to main content

Carbohydrate-Loading and Exercise Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
454 Mendeley
Title
Carbohydrate-Loading and Exercise Performance
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-199724020-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

John A. Hawley, Elske J. Schabort, Timothy D. Noakes, Steven C. Dennis

Abstract

This review suggests that there is little or no effect of elevating pre-exercise muscle glycogen contents above normal resting values on a single exhaustive bout of high-intensity exercise lasting less than 5 minutes. Nor is there any benefit of increasing starting muscle glycogen content on moderate-intensity running or cycling lasting 60 to 90 minutes. In such exercise substantial quantities of glycogen remain in the working muscles at the end of exercise. However, elevated starting muscle glycogen content will postpone fatigue by approximately equal to 20% in endurance events lasting more than 90 minutes. During this type of exercise, exhaustion usually coincides with critically low (25 mmol/kg wet weight) muscle glycogen contents, suggesting the supply of energy from glycogen utilisation cannot be replaced by an increased oxidation of blood glucose. Glycogen supercompensation may also improve endurance performance in which a set distance is covered as quickly as possible. In such exercise, high carbohydrate diets have been reported to improve performance by 2 to 3%.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 442 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 120 26%
Student > Master 78 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 9%
Researcher 24 5%
Student > Postgraduate 21 5%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 111 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 151 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 5%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 127 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#311,346
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#299
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,633
of 192,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#36
of 831 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 831 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.