↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Vemurafenib Treatment in 43 Metastatic Melanoma Patients with BRAF Mutation. Single-Institute Retrospective Analysis, Early Real-Life Survival Data

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology & Oncology Research, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of Vemurafenib Treatment in 43 Metastatic Melanoma Patients with BRAF Mutation. Single-Institute Retrospective Analysis, Early Real-Life Survival Data
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12253-017-0324-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kata Czirbesz, Eszter Gorka, Tímea Balatoni, Gitta Pánczél, Krisztina Melegh, Péter Kovács, András Gézsi, Gabriella Liszkay

Abstract

BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib achieved improved overall survival over chemotherapy and have been approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. The aim of our retrospective analysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of vemurafenib therapy for BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma and subsequently to prove the clinical benefit for the studied 43 patients, based on real-life data. From November 2012 to October 2015 we have selected 43 BRAF mutated, metastatic melanoma patients, treated with vemurafenib. The median follow-up time was 15.9 months. We evaluated progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. According to the AJCC staging system 70% of the patients had stage M1c metastasis, including 6 with stable brain metastasis. Objective responses were noted in 51.1%, the disease control rate was achieved in 79% of the patients. Complete responses were attained by 5 patients (11.6%). Median PFS was 6.48 (95% CI:4.8-15.0) months, median OS was 11.47 (95% CI:8.08-NA) months. We found significant association between LDH level and OS in univariate (p = 0.000613) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.0168). The most common adverse events (AEs) included follicular hyperkeratosis, rash, arthralgia and photosensitivity. Grade 3 AEs, such as cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, QTcB interval prolongation, rash, arthralgia were reported in 7 patients (17%). We had no Grade 4 side effects. Similar to the previously published data our analysis confirms the improved survival with vemurafenib treatment (11.47 months) in patients with BRAF V600 mutation. Vemurafenib therapy was well tolerated, the AE profile was almost consistent with the previously reported data of randomised clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,266,283
of 24,353,295 outputs
Outputs from Pathology & Oncology Research
#255
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,928
of 324,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology & Oncology Research
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,353,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.