↓ Skip to main content

Abiotic Raw-Materials in Life Cycle Impact Assessments: An Emerging Consensus across Disciplines

Overview of attention for article published in Resources, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abiotic Raw-Materials in Life Cycle Impact Assessments: An Emerging Consensus across Disciplines
Published in
Resources, February 2016
DOI 10.3390/resources5010012
Authors

Johannes A. Drielsma, Ruth Allington, Thomas Brady, Jeroen Guinée, Jane Hammarstrom, Torsten Hummen, Andrea Russell-Vaccari, Laura Schneider, Guido Sonnemann, Pär Weihed

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 27%
Engineering 17 22%
Chemistry 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Design 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,540,801
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Resources
#133
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,986
of 298,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resources
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.