You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tiger poaching and trafficking in India: Estimating rates of occurrence and detection over four decades
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.08.016 |
| Authors |
Koustubh Sharma, Belinda Wright, Tito Joseph, Nitin Desai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 31% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Nepal | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 53 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#783,020
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#668
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,571
of 273,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#6
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.