| Title |
Comparison between patient‐specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-014-3264-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun Hoi Yan, Kwong Yuen Chiu, Fu Yuen Ng, Ping Keung Chan, Christian Xinshuo Fang |
| Abstract |
The current study investigated the accuracy in achieving proper lower limb alignment and individual component positions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with 3 different instrumentation techniques. It was hypothesized that patient-specific instruments (PSI) would achieve more accurate lower limb alignment and component positions compared to conventional instruments (CON). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,018
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2,096
of 2,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,261
of 245,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#45
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.