↓ Skip to main content

Epistaxis and nasotracheal intubation - prevention with vasoconstrictor spray

Overview of attention for article published in Irish Journal of Medical Science, January 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Epistaxis and nasotracheal intubation - prevention with vasoconstrictor spray
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science, January 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02943016
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. O’Hanlon, K. W. Harper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 21%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 58%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,487,734
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#286
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,529
of 71,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them