↓ Skip to main content

Is the breast-conserving treatment with radiotherapy appropriate in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers? Long-term results and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Is the breast-conserving treatment with radiotherapy appropriate in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers? Long-term results and review of the literature
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10549-009-0685-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youlia M. Kirova, Alexia Savignoni, Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani, Anne de La Rochefordiere, Rémy J. Salmon, Pascale This, Bernard Asselain, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Alain Fourquet

Abstract

As tumours in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers might be more sensitive to radiation, we investigated after long-term follow-up whether mutation status influenced the rate of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers after breast-conserving treatment (BCT). BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were screened for germline mutations in 131 patients with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer who had undergone BCT and radiotherapy. Patients were matched to 261 controls with sporadic breast cancer according to age at diagnosis and year of treatment. Controls were followed up for at least as long as the interval between diagnosis and genetic screening in familial cases. Rates of ipsilateral and contralateral cancer between groups were compared by the log-rank test. The BRCA1/2 mutations occurred in 20.6% of tested patients. Tumours in mutation carriers were more likely to be grade III (P < 10(-4)) and oestrogen receptor negative (P = 0.005) than in non-carriers and controls. Overall median follow-up was 161 months. There was no significant difference in ipsilateral tumours between mutation carriers, non-carriers and controls (P = 0.13). On multivariate analysis, age was the most significant predictor for ipsilateral recurrence (P < 10(-3)). The rate of contralateral cancer was significantly higher in familial cases: 40.7% (mutation carriers), 20% (non-carriers), and 11% (controls) (P < 10(-4)). After 13.4 years of follow-up, the rate of ipsilateral tumours was no higher in mutation carriers than in non-carriers or controls. As tumours in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers might be more sensitive to radiation, BCT is a possible treatment option.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,306,466
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,297
of 4,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,612
of 164,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#46
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.