You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Hip Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review of Outcomes and Progression to Hip Arthroplasty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3943-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne L. Kemp, David MacDonald, Natalie J. Collins, Anna L. Hatton, Kay M. Crossley |
| Abstract |
Hip arthroscopy is now commonly used to treat hip pain and pathology, including osteoarthritis (OA). Despite this, little is known about the effect of hip arthroscopy on outcomes of pain and function and progression to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in hip OA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 51 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,201,634
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,311
of 7,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,440
of 260,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#23
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.