| Title |
Training Teachers to Deliver Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Learning from the UK Experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mindfulness, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12671-010-0010-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca S. Crane, Willem Kuyken, Richard P. Hastings, Neil Rothwell, J. Mark G. Williams |
| Abstract |
Several randomised controlled trials suggest that mindfulness-based approaches are helpful in preventing depressive relapse and recurrence, and the UK Government's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has recommended these interventions for use in the National Health Service. There are good grounds to suggest that mindfulness-based approaches are also helpful with anxiety disorders and a range of chronic physical health problems, and there is much clinical and research interest in applying mindfulness approaches to other populations and problems such as people with personality disorders, substance abuse, and eating disorders. We review the UK context for developments in mindfulness-based approaches and set out criteria for mindfulness teacher competence and training steps, as well as some of the challenges and future directions that can be anticipated in ensuring that evidence-based mindfulness approaches are available in health care and other settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 391 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 81 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 8% |
| Researcher | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 114 | 28% |
| Unknown | 54 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 181 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 63 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 67 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,222,096
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Mindfulness
#890
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,747
of 97,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mindfulness
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.