↓ Skip to main content

Growth of Methanogens on a Mars Soil Simulant

Overview of attention for article published in Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 472)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Growth of Methanogens on a Mars Soil Simulant
Published in
Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, December 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:orig.0000043129.68196.5f
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy A. Kral, Curtis R. Bekkum, Christopher P. McKay

Abstract

Currently, the surface of Mars is probably too cold, too dry, and too oxidizing for life, as we know it, to exist. But the subsurface is another matter. Life forms that might exist below the surface could not obtain their energy from photosynthesis, but rather they would have to utilize chemical energy. Methanogens are one type of microorganism that might be able to survive below the surface of Mars. A potential habitat for existence of methanogens on Mars might be a geothermal source of hydrogen, possibly due to volcanic or hydrothermal activity, or the reaction of basalt and anaerobic water, carbon dioxide, which is abundant in the martian atmosphere, and of course, subsurface liquid water. We report here that certain methanogens can grow on a Mars soil simulant when supplied with carbon dioxide, molecular hydrogen, and varying amounts of water.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 103 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 23%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,259,230
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#24
of 472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,477
of 151,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them