You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiac Evaluation of Pediatric Relatives in Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circep.114.001818 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonie C H Wong, Ferran Roses-Noguer, Janice A Till, Elijah R Behr |
| Abstract |
-Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS) defines a sudden unexpected and unexplained death despite comprehensive pathological and toxicological investigation. Previous studies have focused on evaluation of adult relatives. There is however a lack of data in children, leading to highly variable management. We sought to determine the clinical utility of cardiac evaluation in pediatric relatives of SADS probands. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 29% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,517,992
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
#1,306
of 1,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,252
of 250,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.