↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating irreversible social harms

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Sciences, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating irreversible social harms
Published in
Policy Sciences, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11077-017-9277-1
Authors

A. J. K. Pols, H. A. Romijn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 22%
Environmental Science 5 10%
Psychology 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 20 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,366,228
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#361
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,668
of 419,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.