| Title |
Consulting with Citizens in the Design of Wellbeing Measures and Policies: Lessons from a Systems Science Application
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Indicators Research, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11205-014-0764-x |
| Authors |
Michael J. Hogan, Helen Johnston, Benjamin Broome, Claire McMoreland, Jane Walsh, Bryan Smale, Jim Duggan, Jerry Andriessen, Kevin M. Leyden, Christine Domegan, Patricia McHugh, Victoria Hogan, Owen Harney, Jenny Groarke, Chris Noone, Ann Marie Groarke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 27 | 24% |
| Psychology | 14 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,080,250
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Social Indicators Research
#464
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,604
of 256,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Indicators Research
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.