↓ Skip to main content

Improving service uptake and quality of care of integrated maternal health services: the Kenya kwale district improvement collaborative

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Improving service uptake and quality of care of integrated maternal health services: the Kenya kwale district improvement collaborative
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael K Mwaniki, Sonali Vaid, Isaac Mwamuye Chome, Dorcas Amolo, Youssef Tawfik, Kwale Improvement Coaches

Abstract

Health-related millennium development goals are off track in most of the countries in the sub-Saharan African region. Lack of access to, and low utilization of essential services and high-impact interventions, together with poor quality of health services, may be partially responsible for this lack of progress. We explored whether improvement approaches can be applied to increase utilization of antenatal care (ANC), health facility deliveries, prevention of mother-to-child transmission services and adherence to ANC standards of care in a rural district in Kenya. We targeted improvement of ANC services because ANC is a vital point of entry for most high-impact interventions targeting the pregnant mother.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 171 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 25%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 39 22%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 36%
Social Sciences 26 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,283,149
of 23,571,271 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,880
of 7,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,861
of 252,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#47
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,571,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.