↓ Skip to main content

Creation of a Network to Promote Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome: The Lynch Syndrome Screening Network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Creation of a Network to Promote Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome: The Lynch Syndrome Screening Network
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10897-014-9770-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Mange, Cecelia Bellcross, Deborah Cragun, Deb Duquette, Lisa Gorman, Heather Hampel, Kory Jasperson

Abstract

The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Working Group published an evidence-based recommendation stating that every newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) should undergo tumor screening for Lynch syndrome (LS). In 2011, leading cancer institutions and public health agencies created the Lynch Syndrome Screening Network (LSSN) in order to promote routine LS screening on all newly diagnosed CRCs and endometrial cancers (EC). The LSSN facilitates implementation of appropriate screening via shared resources, protocols and data through network collaboration. The LSSN website contains resources for institutions interested in initiating screening, including materials for program development, implementation and sustainability. The LSSN listserv gives providers access to experts in LS screening and implementation. The LSSN database will allow exploration of key gaps in implementation as a consortia-wide endeavor. To date, the LSSN's membership includes 85 institutions involved in the care of CRC patients and nine official partners such as national and state public health entities and other non-profit institutions. Nearly 80 % of the LSSN's members have already implemented routine or universal CRC and/or EC screening. LSSN serves to further the population health potential of universal LS screening through collaborative efforts and resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Other 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,018
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#937
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,712
of 225,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#21
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.