You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tridentate Directing Groups Stabilize 6‑Membered Palladacycles in Catalytic Alkene Hydrofunctionalization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Chemical Society, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1021/jacs.7b08383 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miriam L. O’Duill, Rei Matsuura, Yanyan Wang, Joshua L. Turnbull, John A. Gurak, De-Wei Gao, Gang Lu, Peng Liu, Keary M. Engle |
| Abstract |
Removable tridentate directing groups inspired by pincer ligands have been designed to stabilize otherwise kinetically and thermodynamically disfavored 6-membered alkyl palladacycle intermediates. This family of directing groups enables regioselective remote hydrocarbofunctionalization of several synthetically useful alkene-containing substrate classes, including 4-pentenoic acids, allylic alcohols, homoallyl amines, and bis-homoallylamines, under Pd(II) catalysis. In conjunction with previous findings, we demonstrate regiodivergent hydrofunctionalization of 3-butenoic acid derivatives to afford either Markovnikov or anti-Markovnikov addition products depending on directing group choice. Preliminary mechanistic and computational data are presented to support the proposed catalytic cycle. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 58 | 70% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,384,950
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#6,146
of 62,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,091
of 327,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#111
of 576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.