↓ Skip to main content

A New Paradigm for the Aging Asian Face

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
A New Paradigm for the Aging Asian Face
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00266-003-2099-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukio Shirakabe, Yoshiro Suzuki, Samuel M. Lam

Abstract

Traditionally, Asians have been thought to age more gracefully than Caucasians. The resistance to aging in the Asian patient was credited to the thicker dermis of Asian skin that contains greater collagen and the darker pigment that protects against photoaging. Although these statements are true, the authors propose a new paradigm that explains how the illusion of Asian youthfulness may be understood. The "baby model" purports that the Asian face has many attributes similar to an infant, including a wider and rounder face, higher eyebrow, fuller upper lid, lower nasal bridge, flatter midface, apparently more protuberant lips, and more receded chin. These commonalities between the infant and the Asian compel the viewer to perceive the Asian face as more youthful. However, the Asian face is subjected to a greater amount of gravitational force due to weaker skeletal support, heavier soft tissue, larger amount of malar fat, thicker skin, and a weaker chin. Facial rejuvenative surgery should always be cognizant of the propensity of the Asian skin to unfavorable healing, need for greater tissue suspension, and more conspicuous temporal alopecia. Asian aesthetics that differ and converge with Western ideals are reviewed so that the Western surgeon in particular can comprehend the Asian conception of youthful beauty.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Other 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Computer Science 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,944,966
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#65
of 1,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,957
of 142,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them