↓ Skip to main content

Arsenic-transforming microbes and their role in biomining processes

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Arsenic-transforming microbes and their role in biomining processes
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11356-012-1449-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Drewniak, A. Sklodowska

Abstract

It is well known that microorganisms can dissolve different minerals and use them as sources of nutrients and energy. The majority of rock minerals are rich in vital elements (e.g., P, Fe, S, Mg and Mo), but some may also contain toxic metals or metalloids, like arsenic. The toxicity of arsenic is disclosed after the dissolution of the mineral, which raises two important questions: (1) why do microorganisms dissolve arsenic-bearing minerals and release this metal into the environment in a toxic (also for themselves) form, and (2) How do these microorganisms cope with this toxic element? In this review, we summarize current knowledge about arsenic-transforming microbes and their role in biomining processes. Special consideration is given to studies that have increased our understanding of how microbial activities are linked to the biogeochemistry of arsenic, by examining (1) where and in which forms arsenic occurs in the mining environment, (2) microbial activity in the context of arsenic mineral dissolution and the mechanisms of arsenic resistance, (3) the minerals used and technologies applied in the biomining of arsenic, and (4) how microbes can be used to clean up post-mining environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 221 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 33 15%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 4%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 19%
Environmental Science 34 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 12%
Engineering 21 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 6%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 58 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,275,135
of 25,204,049 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,591
of 10,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,956
of 295,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#10
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,204,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,752 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.