You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Getting angry matters: Going beyond perspective taking and empathic concern to understand bystanders' behavior in bullying
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Adolescence, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tiziana Pozzoli, Gianluca Gini, Robert Thornberg |
| Abstract |
The present study examined the relations between different empathic dimensions and bystanders' behavior in bullying. Specifically, the indirect effects of empathic concern and perspective taking via empathic anger on defending and passive bystanding were tested in a sample of Italian young adolescents (N = 398; Mage = 12 years, 3 months, 47.2% girls). Path analysis confirmed the direct and indirect effects, via empathic anger, of empathic concern and perspective taking on bystanders' behavior, with the exception of the direct association between perspective taking and passive bystanding that was not significant. Our findings suggest that considering empathic anger together with empathic concern and perspective taking could help researchers to better understand the links between empathic dispositions and bystanders' behavior in bullying. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,917,778
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Adolescence
#1,187
of 1,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,212
of 321,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Adolescence
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.