↓ Skip to main content

Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2012 update

Overview of attention for article published in Hepatology International, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
885 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2012 update
Published in
Hepatology International, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12072-012-9365-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun-Fan Liaw, Jia-Horng Kao, Teerha Piratvisuth, Henry Lik Yuen Chan, Rong-Nan Chien, Chun-Jen Liu, Ed Gane, Stephen Locarnini, Seng-Gee Lim, Kwang-Hyub Han, Deepak Amarapurkar, Graham Cooksley, Wasim Jafri, Rosmawati Mohamed, Jin-Lin Hou, Wan-Long Chuang, Laurentius A. Lesmana, Jose D. Sollano, Dong-Jin Suh, Masao Omata

Abstract

Large volume of new data on the natural history and treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have become available since 2008. These include further studies in asymptomatic subjects with chronic HBV infection and community-based cohorts, the role of HBV genotype/naturally occurring HBV mutations, the application of non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis and quantitation of HBV surface antigen and new drug or new strategies towards more effective therapy. To update HBV management guidelines, relevant new data were reviewed and assessed by experts from the region, and the significance of the reported findings was discussed and debated. The earlier "Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B" was revised accordingly. The key terms used in the statement were also defined. The new guidelines include general management, indications for fibrosis assessment, time to start or stop drug therapy, choice of drug to initiate therapy, when and how to monitor the patients during and after stopping drug therapy. Recommendations on the therapy of patients in special circumstances, including women in childbearing age, patients with antiviral drug resistance, concurrent viral infection, hepatic decompensation, patients receiving immune suppression or chemotherapy and patients in the setting of liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma, are also included.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 248 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 15%
Other 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 58 23%
Unknown 64 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 71 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,202,382
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Hepatology International
#114
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,355
of 164,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hepatology International
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them