You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome sequence and genetic diversity of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.3098 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peng Xu, Xiaofeng Zhang, Xumin Wang, Jiongtang Li, Guiming Liu, Youyi Kuang, Jian Xu, Xianhu Zheng, Lufeng Ren, Guoliang Wang, Yan Zhang, Linhe Huo, Zixia Zhao, Dingchen Cao, Cuiyun Lu, Chao Li, Yi Zhou, Zhanjiang Liu, Zhonghua Fan, Guangle Shan, Xingang Li, Shuangxiu Wu, Lipu Song, Guangyuan Hou, Yanliang Jiang, Zsigmond Jeney, Dan Yu, Li Wang, Changjun Shao, Lai Song, Jing Sun, Peifeng Ji, Jian Wang, Qiang Li, Liming Xu, Fanyue Sun, Jianxin Feng, Chenghui Wang, Shaolin Wang, Baosen Wang, Yan Li, Yaping Zhu, Wei Xue, Lan Zhao, Jintu Wang, Ying Gu, Weihua Lv, Kejing Wu, Jingfa Xiao, Jiayan Wu, Zhang Zhang, Jun Yu, Xiaowen Sun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 17% |
| United States | 5 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 61% |
| Scientists | 15 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 468 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 99 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 13% |
| Unknown | 105 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 227 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 89 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 1% |
| Engineering | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Unknown | 130 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#376,720
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#758
of 7,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,585
of 258,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#15
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.